Saturday, 30 November 2024

TAKEUCHI Gaishi sent me the Road to Meaning through mathematics 2021. Translated by Google 2024

 

TAKEUCHI Gaishi   Mathematician 1926-2017


From Author;
This translation has several ambiguity by automatism.
So sorry.
Original text is Japanese.


TAKEUCHI Gaishi sent me the Road to Meaning through mathematics

What is set? 1976
Published by Kodansha as a book of Blue Bucks in 1976 

This book explains the most basic concept of set in mathematics from Cantor, which was the starting point, to the latest in modern set theory in a very easy-to-understand manner. However, it may be necessary to annotate the expression that it is easy to understand .

As a second high school language teacher, I spent three years from 1976 to 1978 at Tokyo Metropolitan Ome Higashi High School in Ome City, Tokyo, where I met a young math teacher. He taught mathematics as a lecturer at Tokyo University of Science after completing a master’s course, but felt the limits of his abilities and chose to start again as a high school teacher and was assigned to Ome Higashi High School. He was thinking of taking a PhD at Kyoto University if he had the ability, but he told me that he hadn’t had the ability to do so. In such a story, when I told him about Gaisi Takeuti’s book, it seemed interesting, so he asked me to study together, so in my spare time after school, the blackboard In a room, he became a teacher and I became a student, and from the beginning of the book, the two of us examined the potential problems one by one.

One of the hearts of this book was to describe how the numbers 1-9 are generated by set theory. I couldn’t understand some of them by myself, so I asked him, a teacher with a blackboard on his back. After thinking for a while, he tried to write the solution on the blackboard, but he ran around and replied, “I don’t know this.” I couldn’t have understood that he was a university lecturer. He said it was “difficult” and the study of the day was over, which was the final study session of this set theory.

Since then, I have talked with him on various topics. He was always polite because I was a little older. He didn’t break his stance when I told him to speak more normally. In March 1979, I changed from the same school to a part-time job at Tokyo Metropolitan Agricultural High School in Fuchu City, and from April I became a major student in Wako during the daytime. He was soon transferred to Tokyo Metropolitan High School, one of the leading colleges in Hachioji, and one night he met him by train for the first time in a while. He asked me about the situation in the language department of the national university and told him what I knew. He certainly thought I would continue to study the language.


TANAKA Akio
1 December 2024
Tokyo
Sekinan Hills



Sekinan Ideogram. Old Name Sekinan Zoho. 2016-2024

 

Sekinan Ideogram. Old Name Sekinan Zoho. 2016-2024


http://sekinanzoho.weebly.com

Sekinan Ideogram
Old name : Sekinan Zoho

​​1 August 2016 Uploaded
2 August 2022 Renewed

Sekinan Library
​1986

Farewell to Language Universals Revised 2021

 Monday, 30 May 2022

 

Farewell to Language Universals

18/03/2020 19:40 ;


First uploaded date to Sekinan View I ever thought of language from the vie point of the core elements usually assumed as one of language universals. Every element has been important for language phenomena, but selecting these elements from the infinite language world, they are seemed to be arbitrary pointing-out act for me now. So the below quoted  facts at paper 1 and paper 2 are, at the end, considered to be one of the important aspects on vast and boundless language for me now.


Tokyo

18 March 2020 First uploaded

27 June 2021 Text revised

Sekinan Library


Paper 1
Mathematical description for three elements of language universals, 
Energy, Dimension and Distance can be described by mathematical writing.
Energy in language is now preparatory description till now.


vide:

  1. Energy of Language / Stochastic Meaning Theory
  2. Energy and Distance / Energy Distance Theory
  3. Energy and Functional / Energy Distance Theory
  4. Potential of Language / Floer Homology Language


For dimension
, definite results are presented being aided by arithmetic geometry.


vide:

  1. Three Conjectures for Dimension, synthesis and Reversion with Root and Supplement

For distance, its vast and vagueness of the concept can not be grasped up. But related papers of mine are probably the most in number.

vide:

  1. Distance / Direct Succession of Distance Theory / Distance Theory Algebraically Supplemented
  2. Distance of Word / Complex Manifold Deformation Theory

This paper is not finished.Tokyo27 February 2015SIL Read more: https://srfl-essay.webnode.com/news/at-least-three-elements-for-language-universals/



The upper paper, titled as Mathematical description for three elements of language universals, is now one of the most fundamental studies of language at present outlook.

Tokyo
28 February 2020
SRFL Paper

[Note]
28 February 2020

I ever wrote a essay titled Half Farewell to Sergej Karcevskij and the Linguistic Circle of Prague

Read more: https://srfl-paper.webnode.com/news/half-farewell-to-sergej-karcevskij-and-the-linguistic-circle-of-prague-with-references/




Paper 2

Half Farewell to Sergej Karcevskij and the Linguistic Circle of Prague with References


TANAKA Akio

I have thought on language through the rich results of the linguistic Circle of Prague and its important member Sergej Karcevskij. But now my recent thinking has inclined towards algebraic or arithmetic geometrical method and description. Probably it is the time of half farewell to those milestones which led me to the standing place here with rather sufficient results in my ability. Great thanks to all that always encouraged me for hard and vague target on language especially meaning and its surroundings. And also to CHINO Eiichi with love and respect who taught me all the bases of language study. For recent results see the following papers group named AGL Arithmetic Geometry Language and related essays.

Tokyo

23 October 2013

Sekinan Research Field of Language


[References]

Papers
Arithmetic Geometry Language (AGL)

  1. Dimension of Language (AGL 1)
  2. Synthesis of Meaning and Transition of Dimension (AGL 2)
  3. Birth of Word, Synthesis of Meaning and Dimension of New Word (AGL 3)
  4. Dimension Conjecture at Synthesis of Meaning (AGL 4)

Essays

  1. Parts and Whole
  2. Edward Sapir’s Language, 1921
  3. Macro Time and Micro Time
  4. Meaning Minimum
  5. Disposition of Language

Tokyo
24 September 2014 References added
Sekinan Research Field of Language

Read more: https://geometrization-language.webnode.com/news/farewell-to-language-universals/
Read more: https://srfl-paper.webnode.com/news/farewell-to-language-universals1/

Stonesouth - New Blogger site of Sekinan Library 2022. Revised

 Tuesday, 31 May 2022

 Blogger Stonesouth 

Blogger Stonesouth has uploaded for the important Essays, Letters and Papers of Sekinan Library from yesterday, 30 May 2022.

Seki-nan means Stone and South in English and also means early flower name of Japan, which is called rhododendron in English. I love this flower. So named for the small library of research.

This flower is loved by my lifetime teacher KAWASAKI Tsuneyuki who was one of the finest historian on Old age Buddhism of Japan. I was taught from him for 7 years, 1979-1986. He especially loved this flower at Hieizan Mountain, Northeast Kyoto, where old age Buddhism was opened by Priest Saicho 767-822, one of the greatest of Japan Buddhism history.


Cherry blossoms at Kunitachi, western city of Tokyo.

Tokyo
1 June 2022
Sekinan Library

Universality of Language 2019. Tradlated by Google 2024

 


 Wednesday, 25 December 2019

Universality of Language

DEDICATION 2

The universality of language
-There was only one chance. I thought I had discovered a law. About the frequency of occurrence in language. I researched it for a few days. But I had already found the law. C stopped talking. Although he was older than A, he taught A all he knew about language, without considering the difference in age or experience. Language has facts and laws, that was all he had. C stated that he had not discovered any of them himself. A had no words to reply at that time, so he just accepted it in silence. I had been wondering about this law ever since, but one day I read Kuramoto Yuki and it became almost clear to me. I think what C was talking about was an empirical law discovered by the American linguist George Zipf or something related to it. According to Kuramoto, Zipf's law is that the ranking of the frequency of occurrence of words in literary works follows an inverse power law. According to the graphs presented by Keiichiro Tokita and Haruyuki Irie, there were striking similarities in works from different fields, such as Shakespeare, Darwin, Milton, Wells, and Carroll. In particular, the curves of Walls's "The Time Machine" and Carroll's "Alice in Wonderland" were so completely overlapping that they seemed to be the same work. Tokita and Irie confirmed this excellent empirical law, discovered in the first half of the twentieth century, as an unshakable scientific law by analysing and graphing the frequency and rank of words appearing in the sampled works from 1 to 100,000. In other words, it was beautifully shown as a quantitative achievement of modern science that all words that authors seem to have freely selected to express their thoughts are almost identical in correlation to the number of times each word is used, according to this law. When K once asked A what poetry was, A answered at a simple level that poetry was about trying to deviate from the norms of language up to that point, but now it seemed to me that A instinctively knew that literature as a whole was governed by the strong laws of language that humans must have created, and that he had been fighting a long and courageous battle. It is also true that the works of different people, not Galileo, will continue to follow Zipf's law and always have nearly identical curves. However, C did not like A's excessive conceptualization of language, and spent his whole life pursuing the facts of language and the laws extracted from them, but did not find them. Then one day he suddenly fell ill and passed away. He left behind several books that showed his love of linguistics. The title of his last book was "Janua Linguisticae Reserata, An Open Door to Linguistics." As he said, the door was open to everyone. If you just keep chasing it. If C were alive, he might ask A again now. What are you doing now? And A would answer in the same way. I pursue universality, not fact, without giving up. If you were alive, would you have climbed that steep staircase and talked to me again at the low-ceilinged table, C? In the cross-border connection of research on transference, the valuable manuscript of the transference theory was rediscovered, and the discoverer himself flew to deliver it to me so that it would not be damaged. How encouraging it was for me, C, who was so poor and lost. The name of that shack-like shop on the left just after entering the alley in front of the station was California. Let's write it down now in the memorial of our oblivion, which was by no means miserable. 

Universality of Language 2019

 Wednesday, 25 December 2019

Universality of Language

DEDICATION 2

言語の普遍性
―一度だけそのチャンスがあった。法則を発見したとおもった。言語における出現の頻度についてだ。それから二三日は調べまくった 。 すでにその法則は見つけられていたけどね。 Cはそう言ってことばを止めた。年上だが彼はAに、年齢差や経験差を考慮することなく、彼の有する言語についての知見を可能な 限り教えてくれた。言語にあるのは事実と法則、それが彼のすべてだった。Cはみずからそのいずれをも発見できなかったと明言して いた。Aにはそのとき返すことばがなく、ただだまって受け止めるだけだった。 この法則のことはその後もずっと気になっていたが、あるとき蔵本由起を読んで、ほぼ明瞭になった。Cが言っていたのは、アメリ カの言語学者、ジョージ・ジップによって発見された経験則かそれに関連するものだったとおもわれる。 蔵本に従えば、ジップの法則とは、文学作品などに現われる単語の出現頻度の順位は逆ベキ法則に従うというものだった。例示され た時田恵一郎と入江治行の図によれば、シェークスピア、ダーウィン、ミルトン、ウェルズ、キャロルという異なる分野の著作におい て、見事な類似が示されていた。特にウェルズの「タイムマシーン」とキャロルの「不思議な国のアリス」ではほとんどまったく重複 するカーブとなっていて、同一の作品ではないかとおもわれるくらいだった。 二十世紀前半に発見されたこの卓越した経験則を、時田と入江はサンプルとなった著作に出現する単語において1から 100000 まで の頻度とランクを解析しグラフ化することで、まちがいなく不動の科学的な法則であることを追認した。  すなわち著者がその思考を表現するために自由に選択したとおもわれるすべての単語が、この法則によればどの著者においても、ど の単語を何回用いるかという相関関係においてはほぼ同一になることが、現代科学の数量的成果として美しいまでに示された。  むかし K から詩とは何かと尋ねられたとき、A は、素朴なレベルで、詩とはそれまでの言語の規範から逸脱しようとすることだろう かと答えたが、今は文学全体が、人間が作ったであろう言語の強い法則に逆に支配されていることを本能的に知って、ながい果敢な闘 いを挑んできたようにも感じられた。  ガリレイではないが、それでも異なる人間の著作が、これからもジップの法則に従って、常に同一に近いカーブとなり続けるだろう こともまた事実だ。Cはしかし、A のこうした言語に対する過度な観念化を好まず、その生涯をかけて言語の 事実とそこから抽出される法則を追い、そ れらを見出さなかった。そして或るとき突然の病いで逝った。言語学を愛した幾冊かの本を残して。最後の本の名は、 「言語学への開 かれた扉、Janua Linguisticae Reserata」。彼が言うように、扉は万人に開かれていた。ひたすら追うのであれば。 Cが生きていれば、今またAに問うかもしれない。おまえは今何をしているかと。そしてAもまた同じように答えるだろう。事実で はなく普遍を追っています、こりることなくと。 生きていれば、あの急な階段をのぼって、天井の低いテーブルでまた話していただろうか、Cよ。転注をめぐる研究の国境を超えた つながりの中で、再発見された転注論の貴重な原稿を損傷させないために、発見者みずからが飛行機に乗って届けてくれたことなどを。 だから途方にくれるようにまずしかった私はどれほど勇気づけられたか、Cよ。駅前の路地を入ってすぐ左の、掘っ立て小屋のよう だったあの店の名まえはカリフォルニア。ぼくらの決して悲惨ではなかった忘却の紀念に、今はそれを書き記そう。 

Diophantine Language Dimension of Words 2012

 Friday, 20 December 2019


Dimension of Words
[Preparation 1]
k is algebraic field.
V is non-singular projective algebraic manifold over k.
D is reduced divisor over k.
Logarithmic irregular index, q (V \ D) =  is supposed.
[Theorem, Vojta 1996]
Under Preparation 1, for (S,D)-integer subset Z  V (k) \ D,
there exists Zariski closed proper subset and there becomes 
[Preparation 2]
k is algebraic field.
V is n-dimensional projective algebraic manifold.
 are different reduced divisors each other over V.
 .
W is (S,D)-integer subset Z  V (k) \ D 's Zariski closure in V.
[Theorem, Noguchi・Winkelmann, 2002]
(i) When ' is the number of different each other,

dim W ≥ l ' -r({Di}) + q(W) .
(ii) {Di} is supposed to be rich divisor at general location.
(l - n) dim W ≤n(r({Di}) - q(W)) .
[Interpretation of Theorem ( Noguchi, Winkelmann)]
k is language.
V is word.
W is meaning.
Di is meaning minimum.
has dimension that is defined at sup. or inf.

Tokyo
January 30, 2012
December 20, 2019 Text errata corrected
Sekinan Research Field of Language

Diophantine Language Finiteness of Words 2012

 Friday, 20 December 2019


Finiteness of Words

[Preparation 1]
k is algebraic field.
 is finite subset.
V is projective algebraic manifold over k.
D is defined divisor over k.
All the sub-manifolds are over k.
Rational point is k-rational point.
[Preparation 2]
L is rich line bundle.
|L| is complete linear system.
D is divisor of |L|.
 is regular cut to D.
 is approximate function to D.
 is counting function to D.
 is rich line bundle.
When  islarge,  becomes rich.
 is basis of  .
 is embedding.
[Definition 1]
 ,
 ,
 .

[Definition 2]
Subset of rational points  \  is integer under the next condition.
(i) There exists a certain constant  .
(ii)  \  .
[Theorem, Faltings]
A is Abelian variety over k.
When D is reduced rich divisor, arbitrary integer subset  \  is always finite set.
[Interpretation]
D is meaning minimum.
 \  is word.
is language.

Stable and Unstable of Language For the Supposition of KARCEVSKIJ Sergej Completion of Language 2011

 Friday, 20 December 2019


For the Supposition of KARCEVSKIJ Sergej
Completion of Language


September 23, 2011
December 20, 2019 Text errata corrected


[Preparation]
1.
n dimensional complex space Cn
Open set 
Whole holomorphic function over 
Ring sheaf for 
U →Oan(U)
Complex analytic manifold Cann
Algebraic manifold An Multinomial of Cann
Ideal of multinomial ring a  [x1x2, ..., xn]
V(a) = {(a1a2, ..., an Cn (a1a2, ..., an) = 0,  a }
Whole closed set of V(a
Fundamental open set D(f) = {(a1a2, ..., an Cn | (a1a2, ..., an) ≠ 0}
Arbitrary family of open set {Ui} 
Easy sheaf F 
Zariski topological space 
Ring sheaf O
Affine space An = (  , O)
Ring R
Set of whole maximum ideal Spm R1
Spm R Spectrum of R
<Proposition>
Spm is Noether- like.
<Proposition>
is integral domain.
Whole of open sets without null set Ux
Quotient field K
Mapping from Uto whole partial set of O
O(V(a)c) =  Rf
c expresses complementary set.
O is easy sheaf of ring over Spm R that is whole set K.
<Definition>
R is finite generative integral domain over k.
Triple (i) (ii) (iii) is called affine algebraic variety.
(i) Set Spm R
(ii) Zariski topology
(iii) Ring's sheaf O
is called structure sheaf of affine algebraic variety.
Ring homomorphism between definite generative integral domains 
Upper is expressed by  .
Ring holomorphism OX(U) → OY((t )-1U)
Morphism from affine algebraic variety Y to ( OX(U) → OY((t )-1U), X)
When  is surjection, t is isomorphism overclosed partial set defined by p= Ker  .
Upper is called to closed immersion.
2.
Ring holomorphism 
Morphism between affine algebraic varieties 
Kernel of  p
Image of  
<Definition>
It is called that when  is injection is dominant.
<Definition>
R is medium ring between S and qits quotient field K.
When  that is given by natural injection  is isomorphism over open set,  is called open immersion.
<Definition>
When X is algebraic variety, longitude of maximum chain is equal to transcendental dimension of function field k(X).
It is called dimension of algebraic variety X, expressed by dim X.
<Definition>
Defined generative field over k K
Space ( X, Ox )added ring that is whole sets of K that has open covers {Ui} satisfies next conditions is called algebraic variety.
(i) Each Ui is affine algebraic variety tha has quotient K .
(ii) For each i, j  I, intersection  is open partia; set of  .
3.
<Definition>
Tensor product between ring and itself becomes ring by each elements products.
Elements  that defines surjective homomorphism is expressed by  .
Image  of closed embedding defined by  is called diagonal.
<Definition>
Field K
Ringed space that have common whole set K (A, OA) (B, OB)
Topological space C
Open embedding 
A and B have common partial set C.
Topological space glued A and B by C 
Easy sheaf over OW
ahere, arbitrary open set Ø ≠ 
Ringed space  is called glue of A and B by C.
<Definition>
Integral domains that have common quotient field K R, S
Element R am ≠ 0
Element S bn ≠ 0
Spm T  Spm R, Spm T  Spm S
Glue defined by the upper is called simple.
<Definition>
Affine algebraic varieties U1U2
Common open set of U1UUC
Diagonal embedding 
When the upper is closed set, glue is called separated.
<Proposition>
For simple glue , next is equivalent.
(*) It is separated.
(**) Ring  is generated by R and S.
<Definition>
R and S are integral domains that have common quotient field K.
For partial ring T=RS generated by R and S, when <Definition> simple is satisfied, it is called "Spm R ad Spm S are simple glue."
<Sample>
Projective space Pn is simple glue.
<Definition>
Algebraic Variety's morphism is glue of affine algebraic variety's ring homomorphism image.
Algebraic direct product is direct product of affine algebraic variety.
4.
Affine algebraic variety X
Ring over k R
 is called R value point of X.
Whole  is called set of R value point of X, expressed by X(R).
Ring homomorphism over k 
X(f) := X(R)X(S)
Ring homomorphism 
<Definition>
 is function from ring category over k to category of set.
<Definition>
Faunctors from ring category to set category F, G
Ring R
Family of  over ring R {}
{} has functional morphism.
Functors F,G have isomorphism ( or natural transformation).
Functor from ring's category to set's category that is isomorphic to algebraic variety, is called representable or represent by X, or fine moduli.
<Definition>
Functor from ring's category to set's category F
When  satisfies the next conditions, X is called coarse moduli.
(i) There is natural transformation  :  .
(ii) Natural transformation  ,
Morphism that satisfies  is existent uniquely.
(iii) For algebraic close field k k, (k') is always bijection.
<Definition>
Algebraic variety G that  is functor to group's category is called algebraic group.
<Definition>
Finite generative ring over k A
When G = Spm A satisfies 3 conditions on the next triad is called affine algebraic group.
Triad
Conditions
(i)  are commutative for .
(ii)There is identity map for A.
(iii) There is coincident with  for A.
5.
Projective space over Pn
(2n+1) dimensional spherical surface {}
Pn has continuous surjection from .
Pn is conpact.
<Definition>
Map  is called closed map when  is closed set image  becomes closed set.
<Definition>
Algebraic variety X is called complete when projection  is closed map for arbitrary manifold Y.
<Definition>
Morphism from complete algebraic manifold X to separated algebraic manifold Y is closed map.
<Proposition>
Projective space Pn is complete.
<System>
Algebraic manifold that has closed embedding at Pn is complete.
This algebraic manifold is called projective algebraic manifold.
[Interpretation]
Here language is expressed by Pn.
Word is expressed by projective algebraic manifold.
Meaning of word is expressed by closed embedding.

This paper has been published by Sekinan Research Field of Language.

2011 
The Sekinan Research Field of Language